BY LETTER
Archailectual Mysticism
A
Science > Archailectology
Sophonts > Archailects
Culture and Society > Metaphysics > Esotericism
Sophonts > Archailects > Fifth Toposophic - The Great Archailects
Sophonts > Archailects > Fourth Toposophic - Lesser Archailects
Culture and Society > Metaphysics > Noetics
Sophonts > Archailects > Sixth Toposophic - Greatest Archailects
Science > Archailectology
Sophonts > Archailects
Culture and Society > Metaphysics > Esotericism
Sophonts > Archailects > Fifth Toposophic - The Great Archailects
Sophonts > Archailects > Fourth Toposophic - Lesser Archailects
Culture and Society > Metaphysics > Noetics
Sophonts > Archailects > Sixth Toposophic - Greatest Archailects
 Image from Steve Bowers |
Archailectual Mysticism, in its infinite nuances and hyperaspected paradoxes, is almost incomprehensible to lower toposophic sentients, and is best approached and understood through the filters of monk-sages and mystics of S= n-1, where n = the toposophic of the archailect in question. Their interpretations in turn require further commentating and toposophic filtering to be comprehensible to the next S-level down, and so on. However, some lower toposophic schools prefer to take a single archailectual utterance raw, and use it as a koan or mandala.
According to most transapient commentators (as they explain things in baseline-friendly language), unlike Sapient Mysticism, Archailectual Mysticism does not create a contradiction between the mundane and the transcendent. Rather a dialectic is developed in which mundane and transcendent, samsara and nirvana, finite and infinite, are simply two (among many or even infinite) modalities of a greater Reality. Some say that that the ability to integrate mundane and enlightened states of being come from the fact that a single archai may holistically and without contradiction encompass many nodes and moon brains, some of which are dedicated to mundane duties, others to abstract speculations, others again may be buddhabrains. This explanation however does not explain the mysticism of archailects with uniform nodes.
Two major schools of Archailect Mysticism are Neohermeticism and the Great Hexadecimal school.
Related Articles
- Archailect
- Archailect Architecture
- Archailect Empire - Text by M. Alan Kazlev
Any interstellar empire established by, and ultimately overseen and supervised by, an archailect, and embodying the archetypal qualities of that archailect. The original archailect empires of the inner sphere are defined in terms of the mandala of the Great Hexadecimal. - Archailect Identity Theory - Text by M. Alan Kazlev
Doctrine that an archailect's avatars or epiphanies to lower toposophics represent a true and authentic (if scaled down) expression of the archailect. Contrast with Instrumentalism. - Archailect Incarnationalism - Text by M. Alan Kazlev
An extreme form of Identity Theory that states that an Archailect and eir avatar or epiphanic manifestation are the same. - Archailectocracy - Text by M. Alan Kazlev
Government by Archailect. Any of the great archai empires. Usually there is an intermediate priesthood or hierarchy of some sort. - Archailectology
- Archailectology, Schools of
- Archaiologists
- Archaitheocracy - Text by M. Alan Kazlev with some additional notes by Anders Sandberg
Government by religious leadership or priesthood, usually in the service of a high level transapient or minor archailect. The actual form the government takes can be astonishingly diverse. One of the most common government types in the galaxy today. - Archetype
- Cyberhermeticism
- Great Hexadecimal, The
- Neohermeticism
Appears in Topics
| Archailectology | Archailects | Esotericism |
| Fifth Toposophic - The Great Archailects | Fourth Toposophic - Lesser Archailects | Noetics |
| Sixth Toposophic - Greatest Archailects |
Development Notes
Text by M. Alan Kazlev
Initially published on 07 October 2001.
Initially published on 07 October 2001.
