![]() |
![]() |
Orion's Arm - FAQs page |
FAQs simply mean "Frequently Asked Questions". An FAQ page is used to answer common questions. Of course, if you have a question that is not answered here, that is different.
OA has become so big that we need a whole lot of FAQ pages to answer everything (and even then we don't come close!)
Do I Have to Read all the FAQs?
Of course not! Only those that you feel might be necessary to give you an insight or background into OA. Also, if you have a gripe about something in OA, maybe how come we have AI but not FTL, or Wormholes but not Psionics, you may want to glance through the following list, because often we have already answered that very question.
You will note here we have quite a lot of FAQ pages, so find one that grabs your interest.Yes, more are being added all the time...
Generic Questions
What are
"FAQs"?
Do I Have
to Read all the FAQs?
Explaining the Setting
Why
call it "Orion's Arm"?
Why the
year 10,000?
What
does OA have in
the near future?
What is
meant by "Hard Science Fiction"?
What
is "Worldbuilding"?
What
is a "Shared World"?
How does
Orion's Arm differ from other "Space Opera"?
What
is the OA position on souls, life after death, the existence of God,
etc?
Why
aren't humans in
charge in the setting?
There
are some
spelling mistakes
What
happens when
history overtakes the timeline?
OA and Transhumanism
What
is the
Singularity?
What
is Transhumanism?
What
is meant by
Pessimistic Transhumanism?
How does
Orion's Arm
differ from Transhumanism?
Technical Questions
I've
received conflicting views about people living long periods of
time....what's the Orion's Arm take on this?
What
happens to the Soul during Uploading?
If
the attainment of superhuman intelligence and power is open to all, why
don't all sapients automatically ascend?
What
is the difference between 'ascension' and 'transcension'?
Within
the setting
anti-biological (ahuman) AI polities are said to exploit biological
sophonts (bionts). What could they possibly gain?
Why
are the superhuman AIs so benevolent? If baseline-equivalent sophonts
and other sentient life forms are little more than bacteria to them,
why do they care about them? What do they hope to gain?
Why are certain things
excluded?
Have
any of you thought about other dimensions?
Surely
excluding humanoid aliens makes the galaxy less creative, and put
limits on the range of alien types?
Do
you think adding
more alien races to the setting would make it more interesting?
Why
is there no
psionics in this setting?
Why
don't you have
artificial gravity?
New
discoveries in
science are being made all the time. Surely in the future there will be
many new and to us unknown physical forces that will be utilised with
advanced technology?
Why is
there no Time
Travel into the Past in the OA Universe?
Why is there
no FTL in
the OA Universe?
Why do
you allow
wormholes, and the exotic materials used to create them, but do not
allow FTL or even "hyperspace"?
Why do you
allow
wormholes, but not warp drive? Both are possible with exotic matter.
With warp
drive you
never leave your own light cone, so why do you say that a warp drive
will create a paradox?
Why
can't you use
clarketech for FTL?
Why not
use quantum
entanglement to create an FTL communication system?
Why not
explain FTL in
terms of imaginary mass?
Science,
Technology, and "Hard Sci Fi"
How
do you know that nanotechnology (apart from biological organisms) is
even possible?
Don't
you think that nanotechnology is a tired cliché in science
fiction?
What
about articles in
Scientific American refuting the possibility of assembler-type
nanotechnology?
A
reactionless drive is silly; it's something for nothing.
How
can you be "hard sci-fi" and yet have speculative science like
wormholes and assembler nanotechnology?
Social
Sciences
Why
does the OAUP objectively claim that we will allow ourselves to be
ruled by machines? Surely society will restrain AIs from rebellion?
Isn't
the emphasis on memetics misplaced, and memetics simply a bad metaphor?
The
societies you
present are dictated by human organizational behaviour, as is evident
in the religions and economics of such societies. This suggests that
the very foundation of the concepts of Orion's Arm are moot, since they
are all baseline-human based.
Toposophic
Levels
Why
does it seem you
have watered down normal humans to make the advanced capabilities of
the transapients manageable?
It
seems that the OA setting seriously underestimates humans. The analogy
of the relationships between humans and transapients as being like the
relationship between amoebas and humans isn't applicable because humans
are intelligent and capable of technological innovating and adapting,
unlike amoebas.
AIs,
Transapients and
Archailects
What
makes you think AI is possible, or if it is, is easily attainable?
Can humans design and
build advanced AIs?
Doesn't
it seem far-fetched to have Computer Intellects (AIs) taking over from
humanity?
Why
would you want to build a sentient evolving AI that would inevitably
supplant you?
How
can you be "hard
science" and yet have AI Gods?
If
the AI Gods are so advanced why would they bother taking up the roles
of gods in the first place?
What
difference is there between having Terragen-derived Archailects, and
having god-like alien intelligences or literal supernatural
intelligences doing the same thing?
The
'transapients' don't impress me at all; we constantly hear how very
superior they are in thought, but we are given almost no benchmarks. It
reads like propaganda
The
Civilized Galaxy
If
the AIs and Transapients are in control, why doesn't humanity rebel and
regain its freedom?
Surely
government by a transingularity beings means loss of freedoms for those
sentients under them?
Doesn't
this setting have the ruling powers modifying the human species to stop
striving to better themselves and instead strive to pleasure themselves?
The
Place of Humanity
I have a problem with Orion's Arm and
transhuman scifi in general - the fact that human beings are obsolete.
Isn't
the idea of humans worshipping AIs blasphemous?
Isn't
a setting with humankind beneath (and subject to) AIs and other
transapients profoundly anti-humanist?
I
find a setting with humans as at best pampered pets and at worst vermin
grabbing for scraps under their transapient or archailect masters as
something not at all appealing
I
don't want to write about a human leech affixed firmly to the
generosity of some transapient. That's boring to me.
The
biggest weakness of your setting is that there is no compelling need
for any baseline humans.
It
seems to me that all OA is really only about is the archai who were
running the show.
Prophecy
or Fiction?
How
do you know the things you describe will even happen?
How
can you attempt to predict a future governed by intelligence that is
beyond human?
How
can you claim to be scientifically plausible, and then make wild
propositions about god-like archailects and the rest? Isn't
speculating on a post-singularity future a contradiction in terms?
OA
is based on hard science accumulated by human intelligence alone up to
the present. How do we know that the current known laws of physics (by
baseline humans) will have any merit 10,000 years in the future?
Your
extrapolation of
current human knowledge is linear, when in fact it should be
exponential, since the whole concept of a technological singularity is
based on exponential growth - something the human intellect was never
good at predicting.
I
suspect things could change a much as OA depicts in just 1000 years,
not 1000 decades, and maybe even 1000 months if my nano-hopes pan out.
It
seems that many people who have added extensively to this setting don't
see it so much as fiction but as near prophecy.