"Distinct very" should be "very distinct".
A scouting party sent down to the surface discovered an abundance of anaerobic bacteria belonging to several distinct very phyla and a dna-analogue genetic structure, but metabolically not unlike the thermophiles and methanogens of Earth.
(09-17-2017, 01:56 AM)QwertyYerty Wrote: [ -> ]"Distinct very" should be "very distinct".
A scouting party sent down to the surface discovered an abundance of anaerobic bacteria belonging to several distinct very phyla and a dna-analogue genetic structure, but metabolically not unlike the thermophiles and methanogens of Earth.
Which article is this for?
Thanks!
Todd
This is the Penglai article we are currently editing. Fixed.
As long as using the later date doesn't mess up anything with the Tau Ceti article (being rewritten, so likely not) or the timelines (probably not), then probably fine to use that.
Todd
(09-17-2017, 06:37 AM)Drashner1 Wrote: [ -> ]As long as using the later date doesn't mess up anything with the Tau Ceti article (being rewritten, so likely not) or the timelines (probably not), then probably fine to use that.
Todd
I agree, using the later date is good idea.
The page on
Modubots has a link on "MITE array" that only takes you to a page on
mites (the critters). I think it was meant to got to the page for
MOTEs (MITE is defined within that page).
Ciao,
Terrafamilia
