+- The Orion's Arm Universe Project Forums (https://www.orionsarm.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Offtopics and Extras; Other Cool Stuff (https://www.orionsarm.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Forum: Suggestion Box - OA website (https://www.orionsarm.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=21)
+--- Thread: 210 AT or 309 AT? (/showthread.php?tid=2559)
210 AT or 309 AT? - QwertyYerty - 12-19-2016
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/5326028bdf21c
210 AT (AD 2279)
2279 AD/ CE = 309 AT
RE: 210 AT or 309 AT? - stevebowers - 12-19-2016
I think 309 sounds more likely. That means putting the more successful VAH clade back a few years, to 397, say. Genetic modification of humans is likely to be a long and difficult process, with many semi-successful attempts; the Vac-suckers are one of these, of course. And some downright failures, which we haven't talked about much, but which would have been political dynamite at the time.
Edit - done.
RE: 210 AT or 309 AT? - Drashner1 - 12-19-2016
Actually, per our new Tranquility Calendar Calculator, 2279 AD = 310 AT.
Todd
RE: 210 AT or 309 AT? - stevebowers - 12-19-2016
Ah yes- there is no year Zero. Quite right. Fixed