Proof-reading EG - Printable Version +- The Orion's Arm Universe Project Forums (https://www.orionsarm.com/forum) +-- Forum: Offtopics and Extras; Other Cool Stuff (https://www.orionsarm.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Forum: Suggestion Box - OA website (https://www.orionsarm.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=21) +--- Thread: Proof-reading EG (/showthread.php?tid=678) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
|
RE: Proof-reading EG - stevebowers - 04-10-2018 I should have provided a link- neuron star is correct. http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/462d995c13c9e ...actually, now I come to think of it; if we use the Content Management System, links doen't work very well in the captions of images, so I'd better leave it as it is. RE: Proof-reading EG - selden - 04-11-2018 Maybe include neutron in parentheses to clarify it? (I now seem to recall making this same mistake in the past.) The article on neuron stars does say that they actually are based on neutron stars. RE: Proof-reading EG - selden - 04-11-2018 http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/476ecbbab3126 Relay001 from ones starting point should be from one's starting point gates to ones destination should be gates to one's destination RE: Proof-reading EG - selden - 05-16-2018 http://www.orionsarm.com/xcms.php?r=oa-story&story=tad_finders_keepers has lots of apostrophes missing in possessives. RE: Proof-reading EG - selden - 05-16-2018 http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/4f839903c195d Enhancer Typically, the heroes discovers the device should be Typically, the heroes discover the device Suggestion: change In the case of genuine enhancer devices, these do exist, but are rare, to Genuine enhancer devices do exist, but are rare, RE: Proof-reading EG - Avengium - 06-13-2018 http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/45ce493e2bea5 Technorapture Hypernation In the datapanel appears the clade Animant, but who or what is an animant? Also, the TRHN Datapanel could benefit from adding more hyperlinks. And linking things like Omegarapture , Known Space , Archai , etc RE: Proof-reading EG - stevebowers - 06-13-2018 Animants are, I think, a very early version of what later became provolves or rianths, RE: Proof-reading EG - Avengium - 06-13-2018 Then, it should be ammended on the article. RE: Proof-reading EG - ProxCenBound - 06-14-2018 All updates done, with exceptions noted below... (06-13-2018, 08:05 AM)Avengium Wrote: http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/45ce493e2bea5 I folded the animants into the postprovolves/postsplices. We apparently do not have articles for Omegarapture and Known Space. I linked "archai". (05-16-2018, 03:54 AM)selden Wrote: http://www.orionsarm.com/xcms.php?r=oa-story&story=tad_finders_keepers I was not able to find where I can edit pages, or else I do not have access. Someone else will have to fix those. (04-09-2018, 09:40 PM)selden Wrote: http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/485acf5ed292b Before I do that, since it is a somewhat big change and has to do with canon, I would like confirmation from an admin. Are we supposed to change sentient to sophont in that article? RE: Proof-reading EG - Rynn - 06-14-2018 (06-14-2018, 06:38 AM)Crossroads Wrote: Before I do that, since it is a somewhat big change and has to do with canon, I would like confirmation from an admin. Are we supposed to change sentient to sophont in that article? For the bill yes but I'd leave the protocol unchanged, AIUI the protocol isn't just about sophonts but any sentient being (e.g. animals, pre-sophont bots etc). They're a more complex concept related to ontologies that define appropriate behaviours relative to the sentience of the entities in question. Rather than just a straight swap at the name if anyone thinks there should be a change it can be discussed in its own thread. |