Why is SETI unsuccessful?
|
Why is SETI unsuccessful?
|
10-11-2015, 10:21 AM
TYC 1220-91-1 is the best candidate for SETI. It is a solar twin older than the sun, and a few years ago a "WOW!" type signal was picked up at 21 cm/Pi 1420 MHz*Pi...a magic frequency.
It convinced me to run SETI@HOME on my Mac when I heard about it.
SHARKS (crossed out) MONGEESE (sic) WITH FRICKIN' LASER BEAMS ATTACHED TO THEIR HEADS
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Why is SETI unsuccessful? - by iancampbell - 10-02-2015, 06:33 AM
RE: Why is SETI unsuccessful? - by stevebowers - 10-02-2015, 08:04 AM
RE: Why is SETI unsuccessful? - by Bear - 10-02-2015, 12:33 PM
RE: Why is SETI unsuccessful? - by Rynn - 10-02-2015, 10:40 PM
RE: Why is SETI unsuccessful? - by Drashner1 - 10-03-2015, 11:39 AM
RE: Why is SETI unsuccessful? - by tmazanec1 - 10-11-2015, 10:21 AM
RE: Why is SETI unsuccessful? - by totaleclipse1985 - 10-15-2015, 10:20 PM
|
