The Orion's Arm Universe Project Forums





210 AT or 309 AT?
#2
I think 309 sounds more likely. That means putting the more successful VAH clade back a few years, to 397, say. Genetic modification of humans is likely to be a long and difficult process, with many semi-successful attempts; the Vac-suckers are one of these, of course. And some downright failures, which we haven't talked about much, but which would have been political dynamite at the time.

Edit - done.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
210 AT or 309 AT? - by QwertyYerty - 12-19-2016, 05:45 AM
RE: 210 AT or 309 AT? - by stevebowers - 12-19-2016, 07:51 AM
RE: 210 AT or 309 AT? - by Drashner1 - 12-19-2016, 07:57 AM
RE: 210 AT or 309 AT? - by stevebowers - 12-19-2016, 08:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)