02-14-2017, 09:00 AM
Why does is the frenetic pace of change considered to have ended at the end of the Interplanetary age instead of the end or the nanotech age? Are the bolded words below typos?
7) Technological Stability: The rate of change from the point of view of SI<1 entities is much slower than it was during the pre-Technocalypse (Industrial Age through to Space Age) periods, though not so slow as it was during the Palaeolithic.
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/45b2ddfe5cc19
Popular thinking identifies High Tech as characteristic of the First Federation Age. In fact, though, most of the essential elements of High Tech were in place by the close of the Interplanetary Age.
...
The frenetic pace of change between the end of the Agricultural Age and the end of the Interplanetary Age has never since been matched in terms of technologies for subsingularity beings.
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/45cfd626aae0d
7) Technological Stability: The rate of change from the point of view of SI<1 entities is much slower than it was during the pre-Technocalypse (Industrial Age through to Space Age) periods, though not so slow as it was during the Palaeolithic.
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/45b2ddfe5cc19
Popular thinking identifies High Tech as characteristic of the First Federation Age. In fact, though, most of the essential elements of High Tech were in place by the close of the Interplanetary Age.
...
The frenetic pace of change between the end of the Agricultural Age and the end of the Interplanetary Age has never since been matched in terms of technologies for subsingularity beings.
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/45cfd626aae0d