Proof-reading EG

[selden]

http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/596dfb09acae1
Ontology

The introductory paragraph has too few quote symbols. Apparently the "close quote" symbol is not recognized and a ? is shown instead.

A curious thing about the ontological problem is its simplicity. It can be put in three Anglo-Saxon monosyllables: "What is there?? It can be answered, moreover, in a word—"Everything?—and everyone will accept this answer as true. However, this is merely to say that there is what there is. There remains room for disagreement over cases. On What There Is, Willard Van Orman Quine, 21 BT

should be
A curious thing about the ontological problem is its simplicity. It can be put in three Anglo-Saxon monosyllables: "What is there?" It can be answered, moreover, in a word—"Everything"—and everyone will accept this answer as true. However, this is merely to say that there is what there is. There remains room for disagreement over cases. On What There Is, Willard Van Orman Quine, 21 BT

http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/478434a56eb65
Second Federation Ontology

and fermented discontent
should be
and fomented discontent

(despite the amusing images it foments )