EmDrive Space Engine Passes Peer Review

[Rynn]

Speaking to some physics friends this paper seems highly dubious. It mentions possible variables like out-gassing, wind and seismic activity but doesn't do much to measure and characterise them. The measurements are more sensitive than the machine is capable of, the statistics are apparently problematic, they only have three hours of data despite months of testing and the journal has an impact factor of 1.2! The last point makes me wonder how many journals rejected the paper until this one accepted it.