The Orion's Arm Universe Project Forums





Proof-reading EG
(02-20-2017, 02:41 AM)selden Wrote: http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/4e26e0f62441a
Transcend Seven

Fixed; thanks!
Reply
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/506308cd7f8c1
Plasma Processor

ball of plasma operating nuclear temperatures
should be
ball of plasma operating at nuclear temperatures
Selden
Reply
(02-22-2017, 08:09 AM)selden Wrote: http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/506308cd7f8c1
Plasma Processor

ball of plasma operating nuclear temperatures
should be
ball of plasma operating at nuclear temperatures

Fixed.

Thanks!

Todd
Reply
(02-14-2017, 09:46 AM)Drashner1 Wrote: I suspect that what is meant here is Interplanetary Era, which includes (somewhat confusingly) the Interplanetary Age and the Nanotech Age.

If others agree with me, this is easily adjusted.

Todd

We could replace interplanetary with nanotech

The frenetic pace of change between the end of the Agricultural Age and the end of the Interplanetary Nanotech Age has never since been matched in terms of technologies for subsingularity beings.

http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/45cfd626aae0d
Reply
History of the civilisation collapse that befell Earth and the Solar System in the Late Interplanetary Age Era. The Technocalypse is known by many other popular names, including the Nanodisaster, the Technocrash, and the Swarms as well as more technical terms such as the Cascading Complexity Collapse.

http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/5017ed84be378
Reply
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/49350e2d34113
Propulsion Technology

For consistency with other headings,
S1 Technologies
should be
S:1 Technologies
and
S2 Technologies
should be
S:2 Technologies
Selden
Reply
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/49305d833f2cf
Fifth Toposophic - The Great Archailects

Inconsistent use of S5 and S:5 in the article. Presumably all occurrences of S5 should be changed to S:5
Selden
Reply
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-topic/4930657c5516d
Sixth Toposophic - Greatest Archailects

In the data panel,
Toposophic: S5 (Forad scale)
should be
Toposophic: S:6 (Forad scale)
Selden
Reply
http://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/4b76a3e624ba6
Void Swarms

It is not know how many nested layers
should be
It is not known how many nested layers

reports of an strangely behaving S4
should be
reports of a strangely behaving S4
Selden
Reply
The issues raised in Posts 584-589 have all been fixed.

Thanks!

Todd
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)