06-08-2023, 06:51 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2023, 06:51 AM by stevebowers.)
I think the plural term used in connection with the Fubas event is supposed to be Fubasii, and Fubaii is just a typo. The Jilunan article needs a bit more detail (for instance, are there 2613 billion Fubasii on the planet Jilunan, or is that the total population of the solar system? Reading the article about the Fubas Clone event, this is supposed to be the population of the whole system, not just the planet). I'll adjust that.
--------------
I agree that Dreadnought should be the correct term, even though the actual term used in that era would probably be significantly different. We use the conceit that the Encyclopedia Galactica is a translation into current-day English from the numerous types of language used in the far future, so many of the words and neologisms are fairly arbitrary.
--------------
I agree that Dreadnought should be the correct term, even though the actual term used in that era would probably be significantly different. We use the conceit that the Encyclopedia Galactica is a translation into current-day English from the numerous types of language used in the far future, so many of the words and neologisms are fairly arbitrary.